[ros-dev] Why GAS not NASM?
nitro2k01 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 3 16:32:30 CET 2006
Pardon me if I'm wrong, but isn't it possible to use both at the same
time? (Eg by choosing another file extension for files to be compiled
On 1/3/06, Alex Buell <alex.buell at munted.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 06:38:51 -0500 Steven Edwards <winehacker at gmail.com>
> waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
> > On 1/2/06, Alex Buell <alex.buell at munted.org.uk> wrote:
> > > I think our problem is because we are using GAS and NASM to assemble
> > > the various assembly files. Oughtn't we standardise on NASM? Why not?
> > My question is why nasm and not gas. Gas can handle both assembly
> > syntaxes right? Why do we need a extra tool if this is the case?
> You could be right. Unfortunately gas differs between versions which is
> why I can't compile fastinterlck.S with binutils 18.104.22.168.2. Hence my
> Anyone that thinks an imaginary deity is going to protect them against
> earthquakes and hurricanes needs psychiatric help.
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
The blog of nitro2k01: <http://soundandcomplete.blogspot.com/>
Saliga äro de som kan stava till 2k01! Sniphpha sniphph!
More information about the Ros-dev